'D'apres Caspar David Friedrich'. Photo: Carlo Chiopris

Sunday 18 March 2012

A beautiful dialogue of equal subjects ... a Q&A with SF about Wojtyla's poetry

What first captivated you about the poetry of JPII?

It was because it was so very thought-provoking, not just on the level of the mind but regarding the soul’s search – not just for God, but for meaning, recognition, acceptance, peace … I didn’t even read whole poems at first, just a line or two - it quite literally had the effect, on me anyway, of knocking the wind out of my sails.

Why?

Thinking about it now I would say that this is poetry targeted at the ‘real self’ – and at the time I was very out of touch with authentic life. The world of poetry opened up to me when I was about 13 when I read a poem by Tennyson called Despair; this poem is a dramatic monologue that posits the question: What is God really like?  Literally this poem got me into all poetry … So for me poetry and my spiritual search from the very beginning were absolutely connected.

How old where you?

I was about 14 when I found a copy of Easter Vigil by Karol Wojtyla in a charity shop. I was not a Christian at the time, so what prompted me to open a tatty book with the Pope waving from his popemobile, I really don’t know …From that time on I became interested in the artistic side of this man who was Pope and began to collect articles and newspaper clippings, (which I have to say never amounted to very much!) Today, as a non-Roman Catholic Christian I am genuinely amazed at what is either the lack of interest or awareness of Wojtyla’s artistic output.

What is unique or special about JP II’s poetry?

Even in translation it is excellent poetry, deeply religious and philosophical, but not at all devotional. One of the reasons it is unique, I think, is because it combines the intellect of a philosopher with the sensitivities of a poet who had a deeply contemplative, as well as religious life. It is a very rare combination.

 Could you briefly explain his Rhapsodic Theatre technique?

Rhapsodic Theatre, or Theatre of the Living Word, was a distinctive form of theatre co-founded in Poland by Dr. Mieczyslaw Kotlarczyk and Karol Wojtyla in 1941. The central Rhapsodic principle is stated: “Word is the pre-element of theatre”; that means that word, as an expression of thought, is separated from action, in order to “transmit a vision of the mind.” Theatre is then “evoked from the word.” It is an abstract and intellectual theatrical vision that Wojtyla sets out in his The Collected Plays and Writing on Theatre (a very hard book to get hold of indeed!)

Wojtyla says in his essay On the Theater of the Word: “The problem acts … The impact of the performance is caused not by events, transferred in a literary manner from life to the stage, but by the problem itself.” His most well-known play The Jeweller’s Shop presents a problem devastating in its impact if no solution is found. I would state the problem like this: How can marriage be wanted or desirable if you have grown up a/ with only the ghost of a father or b/ within the ego-driven bitterness of parents in flight from themselves and the world? So problem-solving is central to the Rhapsodic method, and also a certain stylistic treatment is required in the absence of narrative structure and accompanying props  - for example, the use of sound effects, visual effects, symbols on stage, mime, gesture (as absolutely key), dance, music and the device of the chorus.

One implication of the Rhapsodic method is that it opens up works not intended for the stage for production – poetry, novels, even works of philosophy. However, Wojtyla says that the crux of the matter in Rhapsodic Theatre is in relation to the man on stage - this man [actor] is “realising man” with the help of theatrical means.


How do you introduce people to it in the workshops?

The Place Within workshop introduces people to Wojyla’s poetry, giving them an opportunity to respond with reflections/poetry of their own. Each participant receives a 12-page booklet with poems grouped in themes: Passing Time, Prayer, Profile – of a biblical character, Profile – of a certain kind of person, Thought, Work, Communion, Meditation and Dialogues. Participants are free to respond to the poetry as they feel led, but in the Prayer section there are three exercises. The first exercise is a reflection question: What do I adore? This was to respond to Wojtyla’s lines from Song of the Hidden God.

I adore you, fragrant hay, because in you
no pride ripens as in ears of corn;
I adore you, fragrant hay, because you cuddled
a barefoot baby, manger-born.

I adore you, rough wood, because I find
no complaint in your fallen leaves;
I adore you, rough wood: you covered His shoulders
with blood-drenched twigs.

The other exercises in the Prayer section are to identify a metaphor for the Lord’s work in your life and go on to write a prayer (in response to Wojtyla’s line – “The Lord taking root in the heart is a flower …” and to write two lines following Wojtyla’s statement “God you are so near …”

Much like the Rhapsodic method – I see problem-solving (or resolving) as central in Wojtyla’s poetry. For example, death, our deepest dilemma, needs to be accepted as an inevitable reality. Wojtyla writes in Song of a Hidden God / Shores of Silence (1944): “In such silence I hide, / A leaf released from the wind, / No longer anxious for the days that fall. / They must all fall, I know.” He tells the girl let down in love: “You think you are the centre of things. If only you could grasp that you are not. / The centre is He, / And He too finds no love - / Why don’t you see?” To the schizoid he says: “You must give heart space to your moments / Space to the pressure of will.” And to the Melancholic his advise is: “Push aside the terror of things to be done, / May a simple act be enough.”

One of the exercises I offer people is to think of advice to give to certain ‘kinds’ of people, or people with a particular dilemma.

What can people coming to your workshops expect to do?

Listen to a talk, reflect and discuss, interact with Wojtyla’s poetry through the booklet, and then share the results. It is always amazing what is revealed, and it really is not dependent at all on having any kind of writing skill – in this context, it is all about language and truth – not technique and craft. In fact, technique and craft may get in the way of the heart revealing itself.
However, I do always say that people are free not to have to write or share anything and use the time for their own reflection.

Tell me about your MA – please send the complete title.

The title of my MA was How can the poetry of Karol Wojtyla be used in a pastoral context?  My MA was in Pastoral Theology, so I needed to link Wojtyla’s poetry to that subject. This was a real joy for me because I have worked for many years facilitating people expressing themselves through poetry in spirituality contexts – but I never thought of it as pastoral!

In the introduction of my dissertation I try to sum up what I feel the most important thing this study gave me, and it was getting translations done about Wojtyla’s literary output that unlocked this to me:

“[These] translations, taken as a whole, for me reveal Wojtyla in Polish consciousness. At the end of this study I am left with something I had no awareness of at the start - a strong sense of how much Western Christianity and culture would gain from apprehending Wojtyla the artist, as well as knowing him as the man who was Pope.”

What did you discover about JP 2’s theatre and drama through doing the MA?

I really did discover a great deal – though the body of academic work on Wojtyla’s poetry is very scant indeed. My main highlight was seeing how Wojtyla may be placed within the system of contemporary poetics.

The primary source material for my studies was Wojtyla’s poetry itself, his writing about Rhapsodic Theatre and his various addresses that include his thoughts about culture and art. Jerzy Peterkiewicz, Professor Dybciak and Boleslaw Taborski’s writings about Wojtyla’s poetry were invaluable, as they are seemingly the only people to have represented Wojtyla’s artistic thought to non-Polish speakers. Peterkiewicz, in particular, reveals the poet Cyprian Norwid as a key figure to understand Wojtyla’s writings in a literary context – this aspect was absolutely fascinating to draw out.

The other thing that I gained enormously from was seeing the Rhapsodic method as linking Wojtyla’s poetry and plays. And also, that just as Rhapsodic Theatre needs a certain stylistic treatment – so does ‘meditative’ or contemplative writing – certain devices are key for producing a certain effect (i.e contemplation) …  Peterkiewicz (Wojtyla’s official poetry translator) said that meditative writing needs to use certain devices:  “Meditation in poetry needs a stylistic treatment, which allows for reiteration, thought poised on thought, with sudden leaps into paradox. Cycles of poems seem to suit this kind of meditative writing.”  You see this very clearly in Wojtyla’s poetry.

Dybciak said that Wojtyla’s poetry is “an appeal for spiritual development, a proposal for a beautiful dialogue of equal subjects.” This is a beautiful description of Wojtyla’s poetry that I found to be true. 

What is your own background in terms of drama and poetry?

My own artistic background is writing poetry since a teenager, developing performing it with images and music, collaborating with other artists, working with the Roman Catholic Bard Sarah de Nordwall performing a monthly Poetry Theatre show in Covent Garden’s Poetry CafĂ©, and facilitating poetry workshops in many different contexts - from Cathedrals to prisons.

I have 3 books published – Psalm Readings (which is a simple technique to help people writer their own psalms), and two volumes of poetry The Cool of the Day and Love’s First Look. However, I should say by background in terms of study is Religious Studies and Theology!


http://scfordham.blogspot.com

Sarah Fordham, Feb 2012


 This Q&A formed the basis of an article that was published in The Independent Catholic (Feb 2012)

Sunday 6 November 2011

Introduction


This study was undertaken with the desire to reveal Karol Wojtyla as an artist and to show how his poetry may be of value for those on a spiritual journey today. When looking at Wojtyla’s writings, it became clear to me that an understanding of his formation as an artist in Poland, which during the years of the Second World War came together with his spiritual formation, is central to understanding his specific role in the fall of the Communist regime in Central Europe. My study, coupled with Wojtyla’s interpretation of the Rhapsodic Theatre, reveals his view of the unique role of culture in a nation’s history, and also how the Rhapsodic Method is “one piece” with his poetry, as well as an extremely effective methodology when applied on the world stage.
            This study outlines the historical and political context in which Wojtyla grew up - which notably connected art with the struggle for spiritual and national freedom - to a setting out of Wojtyla’s interpretation of Rhapsodic Theatre in his own words. When looking at Wojtyla’s poetry, which I see as an extension of the Rhapsodic Method, the work of the poet Cyprian Norwid is presented as a key figure to understand Wojtyla’s unique writing.
            A description of The Place Within, a workshop devised for this study, is given as a way of documenting how people may be helped to interact, and gain spiritual insights from, Wojtyla’s poetry. These chapters indicate how the poetry may be used in a pastoral context. The workshop is described, observations made and an interpretation of those observations given by linking the poetry output of the workshop with the language strategies employed by Wojtya. In conclusion I look at how a “non-literary” reception of Wojtyla’s poetry is a useful concept when considering the pastoral use of the poetry.
            This study employs a qualitative research method and is cross-disciplinary; varied sources are used - historical, biographical, philosophical and literary. However, the ultimate focus of this work is theological, because of Wojtyla’s role in history, and also because the subject of his poetry is about the soul’s journey towards God.
            The primary source material for this study has been Wojtyla’s poetry itself, his writing about Rhapsodic Theatre and his various addresses that include his thoughts about culture and art. Jerzy Peterkiewicz, Professor Dybciak and Boleslaw Taborski’s writings about Wojtyla’s poetry have been invaluable, as they are seemingly the only people to have represented Wojtyla’s artistic thought to non-Polish speakers. Peterkiewicz, in particular, reveals the poet Cyprian Norwid as a key figure to understand Wojtyla’s writings in a literary context.
Lastly, I am very grateful to Marta Dziurosz for her translations of Professor Dybciak’s book Karol Wojtyla – the Literature. A small selection of these translations is included in the conclusion. Dziurosz’s translations, taken as a whole, for me reveal Wojtyla in Polish consciousness. At the end of this study I am left with something I had no awareness of at the start - a strong sense of how much Western Christianity and culture would gain from apprehending Wojtyla the artist, as well as knowing him as the man who was Pope.

Wednesday 4 May 2011

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of them all?

The following summary is from the essay Wojtylan insights into love and friendship by Scott Fitzgibbon (Culture of Life – Culture of Death ed Luke Gormally, London – The Linacre Centre 2002).

“The Wojtylan mirror is a metaphor for consciousness. In Wojtylan thought, the mirror is the repository and reflector of what has been encountered or comprehended. It is not the mind as a whole, not even the ‘conscious’ mind as a whole; it is not the will nor the thinking, analysing, reasoning activity of the mind. Rather, it is the medium upon which those things which we experience or understand are perceived, ‘penetrated’, ‘illuminated’, and reflected back to the inner self.  Consciousness is, Wojtyla says at one point, understanding.” (284)

“The Wojtylan mirror is not only a medium for the reflection only of the self. Not at all – a wide mirror displays the surrounding scene as well.  Nor is it a medium for the reflection only of current contemporaneous phenomena: the Wojtylan mirror not only receives and reflects: it retains and records. (p283-4)

Consciousness has a deeper structure which leads KW to construct more complex metaphors than that of a mirror. In his play The Jeweller's Shop the mirror becomes a lens, absorbing what it reflects. In KW's poem Looking into the Well at Sichar, the mirroring surface of the water covers another surface.

Look now at the silver scales in the water
Where the depths trembles
Like the retina of an eye recording an image.


An important attribute reflected in consciousness is incompleteness (289). When we act we are seeking to complete ourselves. “Self-fulfilment ultimately involves transcendence. Transcendence – “inseparably connected” with self-fulfilment – is a surpassing or “a going-out-beyond or a rising above”, says KW in his essay Person and Community. And ... "Transcendence ultimately converges at a single source, which constantly resounds within the human being … Transcendence is the spirituality of the human being revealing itself”. 

Self-knowledge comes through affiliations with others (solidarities). The current age is one of a crisis in affiliations ...


As a man and a woman stand before each other and allow themselves to be known (to be naked and not ashamed), they are present to each other's consciousness. This can be called 'solidarity of consciousness'. This opens up the possibility of the ' solidarity of transcendence', where consciousness of God is transmitted through the conscious of the other person. In The Jeweller's Shop, when Teresa and Andrew stand before the shop window (which acts as a mirror/lens), Andrew becomes aware that he is seen and recognised  by the author of the solidarity of love (p293); the Jeweller is behind the window. As the two are present to each other in each other’s consciousness, the awareness grows that they are both existing within the consciousness of God; He sees them as they really are, as they allow themselves to be seen by each other.

It is the genius of the Wojtylan metaphor of the mirror/lens … that it reflects and contains and transmits this complex set off relationships (293-294)

The thou stands before my self as a true and complete ‘other self’., which, like my own self, is characterised not only by self-determination, but also and above all by self-possession and self-governance. In this subjective structure, the thou … represents its own transcendence and its own tendency towards self-fulfilment. (293)


Also to be noted John of the Cross and Teresa of Avila's use of the mirror metaphor.


I LOVE THIS!! Masses of implications. I can never stand in front of any surface and not affected by what lies behind it. 

Monday 21 March 2011

.. one is not free to be free ...

"Remember that we live in an age when each objection becomes a personal offence, so people either adore one another like gods, or they hate one another like devils - but nobody has the courage to love - and of innate love there is now so little like never before. 
From this follows - that we must not see the weak side in those whom we have learnt to value, nor are we allowed to see the good side in whom we must not value. In other words, one is not allowed to act as a Christian towards his fellow men, that is, one is not free to be free.
As a result there is no criticism today: there is only abuse, evasiveness, or adoration, pagan and blind."

Friday 4 February 2011

The Jeweller's Shop

I watched this last night. Looked on the web for reviews and analysis - really not much out there at all. I found that the film drew me in really not regarding the story or the characterisation at all (which is very slight), but because of the central problem. I was aware that I was 'straining' to get to the end because I wanted to know the solution to this problem, or at least to see how it is resolved in the lives of the main characters.
Now, there may be an overarching, philosophical mediation on time and eternity in this piece symbolised by the mysterious jeweller weighing out the wedding rings and so 'the measure of man'; but I was much more focussed upon the problem, which I would very broadly state as follows: how can marriage be wanted or desirable if you have grown up a/ with only the ghost of a father or b/ within the ego-driven bitterness of parents in flight from themselves and the world? 
I found it an utterly fascinating film, with a very surprising emotional punch at the end that I was quite unprepared for.
I can see why it may have been passed over; I am not sure how on earth you would categorise it; European 70s/80s arthouse maybe, but I don't know enough about film to say what or if there is a genre it would fit into. Generally I think that people don't like to talk about things unless they can compare them with other things. I would love to send this film to three film buff cultural critics (like Mark Kermonde) and see their reviews published side by side.  
(I posted a clip of the film on the Art page)


My poetic reflection written after watching this film is as follows:
'love splintered upon the door because it was shut and shattered upon the window because it was closed ...'

Tuesday 1 February 2011

'The more sand that has escaped from the hourglass of our life, the clearer we should see through it'

and the grains contain the fragments of all i was

and the grains enfold the vision of what i will become

only now is the slipping through the tiny space
only now is the heady rush of the cascading descent

soon to come the fullness of the end
soon to come the containment of the whole

then no more escape
then no more the falling falling sand

in the finishing only clarity
in the finishing only sight